Impact of mutual recognition on regulations in Australia : a preliminary assessment /
This information paper discusses the impact of the national regulatory reform on labour market mobility and interstate trade in goods since 1993. It finds that the scheme appears to be working reasonably well and has achieved its primary goal of removing many regulatory barriers to the movement of p...
Enregistré dans:
| Collectivité auteur: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Livre |
| Langue: | English |
| Publié: |
Canberra :
Australian Govt. Pub. Service,
1997.
|
| Collection: | Information paper (Australia. Office of Regulation Review)
|
| Sujets: |
| LEADER | 05122cam a2200553 a 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | c000282917 | ||
| 003 | CARM | ||
| 005 | 20080616092040.0 | ||
| 008 | 970203s1997 aca 000 0 eng d | ||
| 019 | 1 | |a 12946119 |z 41387492 |5 LACONCORD2021 | |
| 020 | |a 0644476389 (pbk.) | ||
| 035 | |a (OCoLC)38410279 |5 LACONCORD2021 | ||
| 040 | |a NSL:R |b eng |c NSL:R |d XNTU |d VCAV | ||
| 042 | |a anuc | ||
| 043 | |a u-at--- | ||
| 050 | 4 | |a HD8038.A8 |b I46 1997 | |
| 082 | 0 | 4 | |a 381.50994 |2 20 |
| 082 | 0 | 4 | |a 381.50994 |2 21 |
| 084 | |a KN252.K1 I36 1997 | ||
| 110 | 1 | |a Australia. |b Office of Regulation Review | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Impact of mutual recognition on regulations in Australia : |b a preliminary assessment / |c Office of Regulation Review. |
| 260 | |a Canberra : |b Australian Govt. Pub. Service, |c 1997. | ||
| 300 | |a ix, 91 p. ; |c 25 cm. | ||
| 490 | 1 | |a Information paper / Australia, Office of Regulation Review | |
| 500 | |a "January 1997" | ||
| 500 | |a AGPS cat. no. 9608577. | ||
| 504 | |a Bibliography: p. 87-91. | ||
| 505 | 0 | |a 1. Introduction -- 1.1. What is mutual recognition? -- 1.2. The rationale, implementation and review of mutual recognition in Australia -- 1.3. Goals and approach of this information paper -- 2. Mutual recognition of registered occupations -- 2.1. Background -- 2.2. Scope and operation of mutual recognition for occupations -- 2.3. Limitations of mutual recognition of occupations -- 2.4. The impact of mutual recognition -- 2.5. Is the Administrative Appeals Tribunal working effectively as a dispute resolution mechanism? -- 2.6. Summary -- 3. A national market for goods? -- 3.1. Background -- The legislative framework -- 3.3. The limitations of mutual recognition for goods -- 3.4. The impact of mutual recognition -- 3.5. Summary -- appendix A. Registered occupations -- appendix B. The ORR 1995-96 survey of registration agencies -- B.1. Survey results -- B.1.1. Registrations for the period 1994-95 -- B.1.2. Registrations as at June 1995 -- B.1.3. Rejection of applications under mutual recognition -- B.1.4. Record keeping by registration agencies -- B.2. General comments on mutual recognition by survey participants -- appendix C. ORR 1995-96 survey participants -- appendix D. Copy of survey form -- appendix E. Applications to the Administrative Appeals Tribunal (AAT) -- E.1. Security industry firearms instructor -- E.2. Conveyancer -- E.3. NSW nurse seeking registration in the Northern Territory -- E.4. NSW nurse seeking registration in ACT.n paper provides. | |
| 520 | 0 | |a This information paper discusses the impact of the national regulatory reform on labour market mobility and interstate trade in goods since 1993. It finds that the scheme appears to be working reasonably well and has achieved its primary goal of removing many regulatory barriers to the movement of people in registered occupations, and to interstate trade in goods. It does not appear to have had siginificant unintended consequences. For occupations, the Office of Regulation Review (ORR) conducted a survey in 1995-96 of occupation registration agencies. This was the first time occupation registration agencies have been surveyed about the impact of mutual recognition. This survey found that there is considerable awareness about mutual recognition among such agencies and among people in registered occupations. There appears to have been a significant increase in mobility following the introduction of mutual recognition. In 1994-95 nearly 9000 people registered using mutual recognition, equal to 15 per cent of total occupation registration in that year. In addition, by June 1995 a total of 15,194 people had registered using the scheme. Mutual recognition has clearly contributed to the development of national standards for the registration of some occupations. Mutual recognition has put pressure on, or provided an opportunity for, some occupations such as lawyers and medical practitioners to move towards national standards. This ORR information paper provides a initial exploration of the impact of mutual recognition. More detailed research will be needed to fully assess the scheme.ix C 2./ñoØ | |
| 610 | 1 | 0 | |a Australia. |t Mutual Recognition Act 1992. |
| 650 | 0 | |a Trade. | |
| 650 | 0 | |a Vocational qualifications |z Australia. | |
| 650 | 0 | |a Interstate agreements |z Australia. | |
| 650 | 0 | |a Interstate commerce |z Australia. | |
| 650 | 0 | |a Occupational mobility |z Australia. | |
| 650 | 0 | |a Trade regulation |z Australia. | |
| 650 | 0 | |a Occupations |x Licences |z Australia. | |
| 650 | 0 | 4 | |a Commercial products |z Australia |x Standards. |
| 653 | |a Mutual Recognition Scheme | ||
| 653 | |a Government regulation | ||
| 653 | |a Professions | ||
| 653 | |a Trade regulation | ||
| 653 | |a Standards | ||
| 653 | |a State issue | ||
| 710 | 1 | |a Australia. |b Office of Regulation Review | |
| 830 | 0 | |a Information paper (Australia. Office of Regulation Review) | |
| 852 | 8 | |b CARM |h A2:AM36G0 |i C10943 |p 0469631 |f BK | |
| 999 | f | f | |i d8c3073e-4110-5568-b48a-bafd7ed82230 |s 921be4d2-07dc-5f3d-b406-4dcccfe17a56 |
| 952 | f | f | |p Can circulate |a CAVAL |b CAVAL |c CAVAL |d CARM 1 Store |e C10943 |f A2:AM36G0 |h Other scheme |i book |m 0469631 |